Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/22/2004 08:04 AM Senate JUD
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 348-NOTICE TO CRIME VICTIMS MS. KELLY HUBER, staff to Representative Bill Stoltze, sponsor of HB 348, told members that this legislation will require law enforcement officials and the prosecuting attorney to notify a victim, upon first contact, about the Office of Victim Rights' (OVR) ability to assist the victim with the legal process. HB 348 only applies to victims of felonies or class A misdemeanors that are domestic violence crimes against a person. The notification process is simple; it requires that the office name and contact information be provided, which could be on a business card or in a brochure. HB 348 is a straightforward bill that passed the House unanimously. CHAIR SEEKINS questioned whether the victim would sign a receipt or statement proving that he or she was notified. [SENATOR THERRIAULT arrived.] MS. HUBER said the bill contains no enforcement provision but that this same process works well in similar situations. Law enforcement officials and the prosecuting attorney are already aware of the need to notify victims of the OVR. She added, "We're putting in a law to make sure that they know they need to do it but we believe that there's a good working relationship right now and it will be done." CHAIR SEEKINS said he asked because, in the world of private business, when someone has a right to receive something, the business makes sure a receipt is on file. He wanted it on the record that the legislature is not expecting that an acknowledgement be kept in a permanent file. SENATOR FRENCH maintained that it is easy to define when a police officer first contacts a victim, which is usually when an arrest takes place, but it is harder to define a prosecuting attorney's first contact. He asked Ms. Huber about the sponsor's intention and whether the other body discussed defining initial contact. MS. HUBER replied: ...I think there was some of that thought given to it but that is why it's a simple contact information - you don't have to go into any great detail on the office or you can hand them a brochure. It can be as simple as that. We're not asking for them to explain the group or to define what they can do for a victim. It's just a quick passing of information and so...it can be as simple as handing this to them and that's it and I think that that's how they're trying to alleviate your concerns, it's just by the very basic information to be passed to the victim. SENATOR FRENCH expressed concern that the prosecutor and victim often play phone tag; so exchanging information is not as simple as using e-mail or having face-to-face contact. MS. HUBER agreed the bill could require person-to-person contact. SENATOR FRENCH asked for time to give that some thought. He noted: I think you guys are doing the right thing here. You're just trying to say look, early in the process you should give them that information but, from a prosecuting attorney's standpoint, I guess I have two concerns. One, I can see it actually falling off on a paralegal and two, frequently, the first time you have contact with a person, it may be something as simple as a note or a phone...." MS. HUBER pointed out the language in the bill actually reads, "...and from the prosecuting attorney assigned to the defense." Therefore, it does not require that the notification be made at first contact. CHAIR SEEKINS interjected that language elsewhere in the bill speaks to the requirement being satisfied if notification is given at first contact. MS. HUBER indicated the law enforcement officer has probably already given notification. SENATOR FRENCH asked if the requirement is either/or, regarding a law enforcement officer and prosecuting attorney. CHAIR SEEKINS said it applies to both; therefore the language is redundant in that the requirement would be satisfied if the investigating officer and the prosecuting attorney each give the crime victim a brochure. MS. HUBER indicated the notification can be given verbally. She felt the intent is to make sure the two people who are most prevalent in the case at the time notify the victim. CHAIR SEEKINS suggested replacing "prosecuting attorney" with "prosecuting attorney's office" to address Senator French's concern. SENATOR FRENCH indicated that the responsibility typically falls on the district attorney to provide notification but if a paralegal provides the notification, that's fine. CHAIR SEEKINS said the intent is to make sure the victim is aware of the OVR. He then remarked, "I just worry there, in terms of construction, a little concerned, that we're saying they can do this orally but we're saying it's satisfied if they receive two brochures. So, what else would it take to satisfy it?" MS. HUBER responded that the bill also says "or written" and the written material could be on a business card if no brochure was available. She agreed the purpose of the legislation is to make sure the victim knows of the OVR so that the OVR can help the victim through the process. She added, "We're just trying to make sure that happens early on, and that's the key here is that sometimes they learn about it but they're too far into the process that it doesn't help them as much as it could have." SENATOR FRENCH related: Mr. Chairman, I think Ms. Huber is exactly right. This is basically trying to give them notification. There is no sort of remedy under the bill.... No one's going to get dinged for not doing it or they may get dinged in a personnel interview but you're not going to get called up in front of a judge and so I think the intent is clear behind the bill and it's probably written as clearly as you can write it given the vagaries of human conduct. CHAIR SEEKINS took public testimony. MR. STEVE BRANCHFLOWER, Director of the Office of Victims' Rights, stated support for HB 348 and said Ms. Huber outlined the bill well. LT. AL STOREY, Alaska State Troopers, Department of Public Safety (DPS), told members that DPS supports the bill as written. DPS does not believe it will place an extra burden on officers as they already provide information on domestic violence and crimes compensation to victims that fall in those categories. If HB 348 is enacted, the new brochures will contain information about the Violent Crimes Compensation Act. With no further participants, CHAIR SEEKINS closed public testimony. SENATOR THERRIAULT moved HB 348 from committee with individual recommendations and its attached fiscal note. CHAIR SEEKINS announced that without objection, the motion carried. 9:00 a.m. HB 348-NOTICE TO CRIME VICTIMS CHAIR SEEKINS notified members that a letter of intent was attached to HB 348 and called a brief recess to give members a chance to review it. Upon reconvening, CHAIR SEEKINS specified that the letter of intent was from the Chair of the House Judiciary Committee. He read from that letter: Section 2 of this act requires a victim's advocate to include within brochures or other written material to be given to certain crime victims information about the Violent Crimes Compensation Board. It's the intent of the House Judiciary Committee that this requirement applies only to brochures or other written material printed after the effective date of this act. The victim's advocate may continue to supply brochures or other material printed before the effective date of this act until those brochures or materials are exhausted. CHAIR SEEKINS asked for a motion to include the letter of intent as part of the committee's record. SENATOR THERRIAULT moved that the Senate Judiciary Committee adopt and recommend for consideration on the Senate floor the House letter of intent. CHAIR SEEKINS noted that without objection, the motion carried.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|